On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:25 PM, John Rose <john.r.r...@oracle.com> wrote:
> These results are very useful, and you are very welcome to post them. We all
> need to see how things are shaping up in user experiences so that we can best
> allocate our time.
>
> Here's the "but": Christian and I are working on bugs and
> refactoring/renaming this month and next. This means that we have to treat
> performance issues (both the good and the bad) as a side activity for now.
> But ("but" squared) you can tempt us all you want to work on performance, and
> sometimes you will succeed.
>
> At some point, we'll have to take stock of performance issues and start
> shooting them down. At that point, I hope you guys will have a juicy list of
> performance pain points for us.
That's all perfectly fair. Perhaps there's a public bug tracker we
could use to start aggregating perf issues and conversations?
Now a request for pure speculation: How much room do you think we have
to improve perf from here? As far as what I'm hoping to see, I'd like
to have indy be competitive with my dynopt logic, since they are
structurally identical. If that's possible, it could have enormous
ramifications for JRuby performance in general. I'm very excited by
that possibility.
- Charlie
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
