On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Howard Lovatt wrote: > Yes, it is a file I am using to learn/experiment with lambdas.
I don't have a lambda capable javac at hand so let's wait if this problem solves itself :-) -- Christian > > On 18 March 2011 20:31, Christian Thalinger > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mar 17, 2011, at 11:12 PM, Howard Lovatt wrote: >>> Hi Christian, >>> >>> Thanks for looking into this bug. It is possible that the bug is due >>> to a problem of building MLVM on a Mac since there are ongoing >>> discussions between John Rose and Stephen Bannasch at the moment. >>> >>> May I suggest that we wait until the build problems are sorted before >>> looking further into this. Incase you want to proceed anyway I have >>> attached my test files. >> >> Sure. I quickly tried to build your files but it seems they use lambda >> syntax, right? >> >> -- Christian >> >>> >>> Thanks again, >>> >>> -- Howard. >>> >>> On 17 March 2011 23:43, Christian Thalinger >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Mar 14, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote: >>>>> On Mar 7, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Howard Lovatt wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I got the following when trying to use CallSites on Stephen Bannasch's >>>>>> latest build (which isn't the latest latest build and therefore this >>>>>> issue might have been found already): >>>>>> >>>>>> # To suppress the following error report, specify this argument >>>>>> # after -XX: or in .hotspotrc: SuppressErrorAt=/resourceArea.hpp:73 >>>>>> # >>>>>> # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: >>>>>> # >>>>>> # Internal Error >>>>>> (/Users/stephen/dev/java/src/mlvm/sources/hotspot/src/share/vm/memory/resourceArea.hpp:73), >>>>>> pid=57545, tid=4298117120 >>>>>> # fatal error: memory leak: allocating without ResourceMark >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I haven't seen that one before. I took a quick look and it seems >>>>> MethodHandles::verify_*MethodHandle methods could use a ResourceMark. >>>>> >>>>> I will try to reproduce the assert and file a bug. >>>> >>>> Creating a new MutableCallSite object doesn't lead to that assert for me. >>>> Could you send me a testcase (preferably a small one) that fails for your? >>>> >>>> -- Christian >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> mlvm-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mlvm-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
