On Mar 24, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Stephen Bannasch wrote: > At 2:36 AM -0700 3/23/11, John Rose wrote: >> With the renaming going on, the code is changing rapidly. But I think we >> are converging. Please let me know what happens with the next build. > > Today the build completes fine but I still only get one java/lang/invoke test > passing. > > FAILED: java/lang/invoke/6987555/Test6987555.java > FAILED: java/lang/invoke/6991596/Test6991596.java > Passed: java/lang/invoke/ClassValueTest.java > FAILED: java/lang/invoke/InvokeDynamicPrintArgs.java > FAILED: java/lang/invoke/InvokeGenericTest.java > FAILED: java/lang/invoke/JavaDocExamplesTest.java > FAILED: java/lang/invoke/MethodHandlesTest.java > FAILED: java/lang/invoke/MethodTypeTest.java > Test results: passed: 1; failed: 7 > > Some folks have been interested in having me generate an updated mlvm build. > > I've been waiting for these tests to pass before uploading a new build. > > In effect I am using passing the java/lang/invoke tests as a proxy for > determining whether a build is worth sharing. Is this too strict a proxy?
No, that's not too strict. It is the test I use for pushing a patch to mlvm. There's something different about your build and mine. -- John _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
