On Mar 28, 2011, at 4:11 PM, Attila Szegedi wrote: > I think I'd use it if it were available. > > On an unrelated sidenote, I totally read that as "who needs assistance"
:-) If we keep it, we are likely to give it a more distinctive name, like "asInterfaceInstance". Also (or instead), it may be moved into its own class, since it disturbs the rule that MethodHandles a factory for method handles. E.g.: java.lang.invoke.MethodHandleProxies.asInterfaceInstance(Class<?> intfc, MethodHandle mh). -- John _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
