>> This is a possibility, hoping that the entry ticket to the ASM API is not to >> high. >> >> While developing the code to read/write a JDK7 class file, I noticed what I >> think >> is a typo on the >> "http://download.java.net/jdk7/docs/api/java/lang/invoke/package-summary.html"; >> page. The line: >> u1 reference_kind; // 1..8 (one of REF_invokeVirtual, etc.) >> should probably be: >> u1 reference_kind; // 1..9 (one of REF_invokeVirtual, etc.) >> unless interface methods are explicitly forbidden. In the latter case, what >> is >> the motive? > Sorry for the noise, but I have another question regarding the aforementioned > URL > that I use as a specification for JSR 292. It is not clear which elements can > embed > a "BootstrapMethods" attribute, possible candidates being, at first sight: > - a "Code" attribute; > - a method; > - a class. > > My first move would be to regard this attribute as reserved to a "Code" > attribute, > but it seems that data sharing would be increased by putting it a the class > level.
The BootstrapMethods attribute is a class attribute. And you're right that this is not written anywhere :( We should fix that too. > Thanks for any insight. > > > Regards, > > Xavier regards, Rémi _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
