On 04/28/2011 08:15 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Rémi Forax<fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote: >> On 04/28/2011 03:56 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: >>> stack map is invalid. Could be an ASM bug? >> yes. it could :) >> >> Also it could be a bug on your side because to calculate stackmap >> ASM needs to be able to find the common supertype of two types. >> I don't know if you provide your own method for doing that but >> by default it relies on reflection (getSupperClass/isAssignableFrom) >> which doesn't work if your code use a Class that doesn't exist yet. > If you're willing, I'll toss you 1.5 and 1.6 ASM-produced bytecode > off-list and perhaps you can help me figure out if I'm doing something > wrong or if ASM is choking on our peculiar code structure. I need this > working to start running tests with invokedynamic. >
Sure, send it to me. > - Charlie Rémi _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
