Thanks very much. -- John (on my iPhone)
On May 11, 2011, at 9:16 PM, Tom Rodriguez <tom.rodrig...@oracle.com> wrote: > I've reviewed this as well as I could and it all looks reasonable. > > tom > > On May 11, 2011, at 9:08 AM, John Rose wrote: > >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/6939861/webrev.jdk.06/ >> >> This is the JDK code which works on top of ricochet frames. >> >> These frames were put into the JVM last week, also under bug 6939861 in the >> hotspot repository. >> >> It fixes a large number of bugs pertaining to argument conversions, argument >> count limitations, and the filtering, collection, and spreading of arguments >> and return values. >> >> Several new unit tests are added. All of them pass on x86 (32 and 64 bit). >> SPARC and ARM ports are in progress but are not required for common code to >> be pushed. >> >> The unit tests also pass (up to known pre-existing failures) when >> -XX:-UseRicochetFrames is given to the JVM. The old JDK code is preserved, >> which supports down-rev versions of the JVM (no ricochet frames). This old >> code is marked clearly for future deletion and cleanup. >> >> -- John >> > _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev