Thanks very much. 

-- John  (on my iPhone)

On May 11, 2011, at 9:16 PM, Tom Rodriguez <tom.rodrig...@oracle.com> wrote:

> I've reviewed this as well as I could and it all looks reasonable.
> 
> tom
> 
> On May 11, 2011, at 9:08 AM, John Rose wrote:
> 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/6939861/webrev.jdk.06/
>> 
>> This is the JDK code which works on top of ricochet frames.
>> 
>> These frames were put into the JVM last week, also under bug 6939861 in the 
>> hotspot repository.
>> 
>> It fixes a large number of bugs pertaining to argument conversions, argument 
>> count limitations, and the filtering, collection, and spreading of arguments 
>> and return values.
>> 
>> Several new unit tests are added.  All of them pass on x86 (32 and 64 bit).  
>> SPARC and ARM ports are in progress but are not required for common code to 
>> be pushed.
>> 
>> The unit tests also pass (up to known pre-existing failures) when 
>> -XX:-UseRicochetFrames is given to the JVM.  The old JDK code is preserved, 
>> which supports down-rev versions of the JVM (no ricochet frames).  This old 
>> code is marked clearly for future deletion and cleanup.
>> 
>> -- John
>> 
> 
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Reply via email to