> On 05/16/2011 09:48 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>> It seems nobody (including me) has ever bound an interface before that was 
>> hot to be compiled in the compiler.  I need a small test case to add the 
>> missing code (which should be trivial).

I will try to come up with something later today...no promises though.

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Rémi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
> But like with a bounded invokevirtual, there is no profile information
> available so
> using a cascade of GWT (i.e. our own inlining cache) should be more
> efficient here.

Rémi: Have you confirmed that virtual invocations bound into a MH
chain will not inline? So far, I am not seeing that as being the case.
When I bind a virtual invocation, it does indeed seem to inline.

- Charlie
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Reply via email to