> On 05/16/2011 09:48 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote: >> It seems nobody (including me) has ever bound an interface before that was >> hot to be compiled in the compiler. I need a small test case to add the >> missing code (which should be trivial).
I will try to come up with something later today...no promises though. On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Rémi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote: > But like with a bounded invokevirtual, there is no profile information > available so > using a cascade of GWT (i.e. our own inlining cache) should be more > efficient here. Rémi: Have you confirmed that virtual invocations bound into a MH chain will not inline? So far, I am not seeing that as being the case. When I bind a virtual invocation, it does indeed seem to inline. - Charlie _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
