MethodTypeForm.java:
- if (c != null) {
+ if (c == void.class)
+ c = null; // a Void parameter was unwrapped to void; ignore
+ if (c != null && c != void.class) {
You don't need to both tests against void.class do you?
Otherwise it looks good.
tom
On May 17, 2011, at 4:37 AM, John Rose wrote:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/7044892/webrev.00/
>
> 7044892: JSR 292: API entry points sometimes throw the wrong exceptions or
> doesn't throw the expected one
>
> This is basically a bundle of point fixes having to do with corner cases.
>
> Grouped under this bug:
>
> 7038847: MethodType.fromMethodDescriptorString accepts both "binary
> names"/"internal form of binary names"
> 7038860: MethodType.methodType(Class rtype, Class[] ptypes) doesn't throw NPE
> if ptypes is null
> 7042656: JSR292: invokeExact/Generic doesn't throw
> UnsupportedOperationException if invoked via Method.invoke
> 7042829: JSR292: MethodHandles$Lookup.findStatic[S|G]etter throws
> InternalError if SecurityManager is set
> 7041853: findGetter throws unexpected IllegalAccessException
> -NOBUG-: asCollector throws ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException instead of
> IllegalArgumentException for values outside [0..255]
> -NOBUG-: asVarargsCollector gets wrong trailing parameter type
> -NOBUG-: MethodType.unwrap on chokes on void if class Void occurs in the
> parameter list
> -NOBUG-: MethodHandle.toString need to produce compliant output
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
