Yes we do agree. And thank you for framing up the question so clearly. -- John (on my iPhone)
On May 20, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <head...@headius.com> wrote: > do we agree that an invokedynamic bound to a GWT plus some intermediate > adapter handles ending in a direct handle should inline as well as e.g. an > invokevirtual? _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
