I've been testing the new version with Dynalink, which "traditionally" had test failures due to bugs in MLVM.
The good news is that of 6 formerly failing tests concerned with vararg invocation, 4 now pass. The less good news is that two still fail, although with different messages. The bad news is that one test formerly passing with the April 04 MLVM now fails. Going to investigate them and report back. Attila. On Jun 9, 2011, at 2:45 PM, Stephen Bannasch wrote: > I uploaded the latest mlvm built on Mac OS X 10.6.7. > > > http://www.concord.org/~sbannasch/mlvm/java-1.7.0-internal-mlvm-2011_06_09.tar.gz > > I excluded the coro patch because of compilation failures: > > export davinci=$(pwd) guards="buildable testable /coro" > > All jdk/test/java/lang/invoke test pass > > $ jtreg -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions > -ignore:quiet -jdk:build/bsd-amd64/j2sdk-image > -v:summary jdk/test/java/lang/invoke/ > > Passed: java/lang/invoke/6987555/Test6987555.java > Passed: java/lang/invoke/6991596/Test6991596.java > Passed: java/lang/invoke/6998541/Test6998541.java > Passed: java/lang/invoke/ClassValueTest.java > Passed: java/lang/invoke/InvokeDynamicPrintArgs.java > Passed: java/lang/invoke/InvokeGenericTest.java > Passed: java/lang/invoke/JavaDocExamplesTest.java > Passed: java/lang/invoke/MethodHandlesTest.java > Passed: java/lang/invoke/MethodTypeTest.java > Passed: java/lang/invoke/RicochetTest.java > > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
