On 08/11/2011 11:39 PM, Mark Roos wrote:
I was wondering what the expected differences are in the usage of these two paths. The names imply something
but I find it confusing.

In my use case ( in line cache) one of the paths is directly into a method handle to invoke and the other goes to either another GWT or the lookup. Both should be fast up to the lookup which could be slower. I would also like to
see the optimizer reduce chains of GWTs or at least reorder them.

So is there a difference I should be aware of? Right now I put the chain of GWTs into the slow path.

There is no predefined slow path/fast path in GWT,
target path and the fallback path are both fast/slow,
only the usage, the number of time one path is taken
is/will be used by the JIT in order to drive the optimization.

About reordering the chain of GWT, what do you want exactly ?


thanks

mark

cheers,
Rémi

_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Reply via email to