I didn't expect you to still be working and I was pretty sure how to reproduce
it...
tom
On Aug 24, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>
> On Aug 24, 2011, at 8:44 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> I made one:
>>
>> import java.lang.invoke.*;
>> import static java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.*;
>> import static java.lang.invoke.MethodType.*;
>>
>> public class RM implements Runnable {
>> public static void main(String... args) throws Throwable {
>> new Thread(new RM()).start();
>> }
>>
>> public static RM test() {
>> return null;
>> }
>>
>> public void run() {
>> try {
>> MethodHandle m1 = MethodHandles.lookup().findStatic(RM.class,
>> "test", methodType(RM.class));
>> RM v = (RM)m1.invokeExact();
>> } catch (Throwable t) {
>> t.printStackTrace();
>> }
>> }
>> }
>>
>> The problem is that make_invoke_method only does extra allocation when there
>> are non-bcp methods on the stack and there's no ResourceMark above the run()
>> method of a thread. make_invoke_method just needs a ResourceMark. I filed
>> 7082949 for this. Thanks for the report.
>
> Thanks for investigating it.
>
> -- Christian
>
>>
>> tom
>>
>> On Aug 24, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Mark Roos wrote:
>>
>>> I do have a test case that repeats the resource mark error. We are trying
>>> a new packaging so you should be able to run it
>>> without an external connection.
>>>
>>> Hopefully later today
>>>
>>> mark_______________________________________________
>>> mlvm-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mlvm-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
