On 09/07/2011 02:15 AM, Rémi Forax wrote: > This remember me that we don't have any benchmarks using dynamic languages > which is, as you explain, not good on the long term. > > What about having 10 to 12 benchs, one by language, provided by each > language runtime developer > as a good bench for their runtime ?
Well, there are the Computer Language Benchmark Game problems at http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/ . Isaac Gouy doesn't want to support more languages officially, but we can certainly use these as a starting point on some alternative server. (There are fast Kawa versions of all the current benchmarks: http://per.bothner.com/blog/2010/Kawa-in-shootout/ ) -- --Per Bothner p...@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/ _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
