Hi, finally I'm able to suggest a possible implementation of the TaggedArray, earlier proposed on this mailing list by Jim Laskey [1]. The implementation includes a Java implementation (two actually) and an intrisified VM implementation. The VM implementation has intrinsics for the server/C2 compiler, and some of the intrinsics (fill, copy) are currently only available for 64-bit x86.
This is still work in progress, and have a couple of drawbacks. * When running with -XX:+UseCompressedOops the implementation uses two stores for objects, one for the object pointer and one to make sure the tagged bit is cleared. Future implementations might store uncompressed pointers in TaggedArrays. To enable the VM implemented TaggedArray support the following flags must be given to the VM: -XX:+NativeTaggedArrays -XX:+TaggedArrayIntrinsics both are false by default. Webrevs (compared to hsx-comp): HotSpot: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rbackman/tagged.patch/hs/ JDK: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rbackman/tagged.patch/jdk/ Webrevs (for the mlvm patch repository): HotSpot: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rbackman/tagged.patch/hs-patch/ JDK: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rbackman/tagged.patch/jdk-patch/ and finally hg exports of the changes to mlvm: HotSpot: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rbackman/tagged.patch/mlvm.hs.patch JDK: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rbackman/tagged.patch/mlvm.jdk.patch Suggestions, improvements and ideas are welcome! /R [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/mlvm-dev/2012-July/004665.html _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
