"Frozen" would be great I think, and it will definitely please the Rubyists
:-)

- Julien


On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote:

> On 11/07/2012 10:35 PM, John Rose wrote:
> > Thanks!  This will move the conversation forward.
> >
> > -- John  (on my iPhone)
>
> John, Mark,
> please the name 'locked object' should be changed,
> first because the fact that the value object uses bits also used to bias
> a lock
> is just an implementation detail and the name is too close to
> synchronized/j.u.c.l.Lock.
>
> why not steady or steadfast ?
>
> Rémi
>
> >
> > On Nov 7, 2012, at 1:25 PM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote:
> >
> >> Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/169
> >>
> >> - Mark
> > _______________________________________________
> > mlvm-dev mailing list
> > mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Reply via email to