"Frozen" would be great I think, and it will definitely please the Rubyists :-)
- Julien On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote: > On 11/07/2012 10:35 PM, John Rose wrote: > > Thanks! This will move the conversation forward. > > > > -- John (on my iPhone) > > John, Mark, > please the name 'locked object' should be changed, > first because the fact that the value object uses bits also used to bias > a lock > is just an implementation detail and the name is too close to > synchronized/j.u.c.l.Lock. > > why not steady or steadfast ? > > Rémi > > > > > On Nov 7, 2012, at 1:25 PM, mark.reinh...@oracle.com wrote: > > > >> Posted: http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/169 > >> > >> - Mark > > _______________________________________________ > > mlvm-dev mailing list > > mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev >
_______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
