On 01/05/2013 07:37 PM, Noctarius wrote: > Am 05.01.2013 19:15, schrieb BGB: >> On 1/5/2013 10:17 AM, Noctarius wrote: >>> Ok I took some time to make a deeper introduction in what I >>> imagine to do: >>> https://www.sourceprojects.org/default/2013/01/05/1357395720000.html >>> >>> >>> > As mentioned before it would be great if someone is interested in >>> the topic and wants to help. >> well, I guess this forum is more for JVM level stuff, whereas >> all this is more a Java compiler level feature, but oh well... >> > But this feature would need JVM level support to make old code > working. That's the most important feature from my point of view - > you can just make the old public field a property and old external > code does not needs to be recompiled. One idea would be to > relocate the xload bytecode to the property accessor (maybe there > would be a better way).
There is a better way, the load should be an invokedynamic so it can be wired to a getter or a field access depending on the implementation. Now, the real question is what problem do you want to solve exactly ? > > Chris Rémi _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
