On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote: > No. > invalidating a SwitchPoint that is JITed cost your an harm, > invalidating a SwitchPoint which is not JITed is just a volatile write > but you still have to update the callsite to use a new SwitchPoint.
I think I missed some details. In the case where I've "failed" a call site, I no longer bind via SwitchPoint *at all*. The site is bound to a separate mechanism. But on the invalidation side, I continue to construct and invalidate new SwitchPoints due to the way the logic is set up. I'll try to come up with a test case. For now I have also set up the invalidation side to eventually fail permanently and not create or invalidate any new SwitchPoints. - Charlie _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
