I would love to put it together, but my knowledge is minimal. I don't mind the organizing part but I think we need some folks from the jvm side to be the main speaker/know it all(s).
So if we can get some volunteers to be the experts I will gladly propose and mc a workshop/panel mark From: Charles Oliver Nutter <head...@headius.com> To: Da Vinci Machine Project <mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net> Date: 04/08/2013 12:26 PM Subject: Re: JVM Summit Wrokshop/talk request Sent by: mlvm-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net Indeed...I think we need to get all us invokedynamicists into the same room to better understand what's working, what's not, and where to go from here. Consider me in. I'm sure it would be accepted, so a proposal would probably be a formality...but do you want to throw something together, Mark? - Charlie On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Mark Roos <mr...@roos.com> wrote: > It seems like quite a bit of work is going on around improving the > performance of invokeDynamic. > It would be interesting ( at least to me ) to have an in depth discussion of > what is being done and > how I should adjust my usage to get the best performance for a dynamic > language. > > I'll buy the drinks > > mark > > > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
_______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
