I may be slightly confused as to the order in which these patches are expected to be applied & merged but there seems to be some considerable interaction.
Which patch set is meant to remove the final attribute from BoundMethodHandle.internalProperties()? I can¹t find it in any of the ones you¹ve submitted. Duncan. On 14/07/2014 16:17, "Vladimir Ivanov" <vladimir.x.iva...@oracle.com> wrote: >http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8050057/webrev.00/ >https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8050057 > >Cache MethodHandle reinvokers per basic type. >For BoundMethodHandles, rebinding is no-op unless underlying LF is too >complex (see BMH::tooComplex() for details). > >Also, introduced DelegatingMethodHandle whose invocation behavior is >determined by a target MethodHandle. The delegating MH itself can hold >extra "intentions" beyond the simple behavior. > >AsVarargsCollector and WrappedMember are made subclasses of >DelegatingMethodHandle. Also, SimpleMethodHandle extends >BoundMethodHandle now. > >Rebinding and delegation share same logic and LF shape, but have >different caches (LF_REBIND vs LF_DELEGATE). The only difference is >their name. They could be consolidated in the future. > >Testing: jdk/java/lang/invoke, jdk/java/util/streams, nashorn, octane w/ >"-ea -esa" and COMPILE_THRESHOLD={0,30}. > >Reviewed-by: vlivanov, ? >Contributed-by: john.r.r...@oracle.com > >Thanks! > >Best regards, >Vladimir Ivanov >_______________________________________________ >mlvm-dev mailing list >mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net >http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
