Mark,

It is possible to use Truffle for parts of the functionality of your language 
while the language itself is implemented with a bytecode generation approach 
(e.g., native extensions or regular expressions). Overall, I still believe that 
sometimes a larger step is needed when current techniques start to reach local 
maxima. 

Regards, thomas

On 29 Aug 2014, at 22:59, Mark Roos <mr...@roos.com> wrote:

> Moving from the startup thread. 
> 
> Thomas has been wondering why using Truffle as a solution is not getting 
> immediate 
> traction.  I was initially, and continue to be, quite interested in Truffle.  
> So how could 
> Truffle help out us non Java on the JVM developers to the point where we 
> could be a 
> driving force behind it.  First note that myself and I would guess all 
> language implementers 
> ( as compared to researchers ) are like Marcus, very pragmatic.  Small 
> changes are welcome 
> but wholesale ones are seen as a barrier.  So to use Truffle I would want to 
> see it as an 
> addition to the jvm which addresses one of my specific issues. 
> 
> The issue that I have where the solution is not evident is in the creation of 
> primitive 
> methods.  A primitive method in Smalltalk takes the arguments and some 
> constants 
> and executes object code to deliver the result.  Traditionally written C or 
> assembler 
> I now use Java and JNI.  Since we have the equivalent to value types (wrapped 
> byte[]) 
> primitives can be quite important for our vector math ops performance. 
> 
> What would be very nice would be to attach a truffle.jar, pass it some data 
> structure 
> which defines a primitive and get back a method handle wrapping some 
> optimized object code. 
> Given that this MH comes from a known source perhaps the jni like overhead 
> could 
> be much reduced similar to an intrinsic. 
> 
> This would be much simpler, I would guess, then the Panama effort to wrap 
> arbitrary code. 
> Plus I would not have to have a pre made object file per external 
> environment. 
> 
> regards 
> mark_______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Reply via email to