On 09/05/2014 04:07 PM, Morris Meyer wrote:
Remi,
That assert in a static method could be pulled out to a static block.
Regarding the asserts in the LambdaForms code, my feeling is that in
code that is still in the process of being refactored, that they are
critical to maintain integrity. After the dust settles, creating a
debugging subclass used for testing, and moving some of the asserts to
unit tests might be helpful for performance.
--mm
Hi Morris,
I fully agree.
Rémi
On 9/5/14, 2:59 AM, Remi Forax wrote:
On 09/03/2014 07:46 PM, John Rose wrote:
On Sep 3, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Mark Roos <mr...@roos.com> wrote:
From Morris
All that assert laden code is nice to see.
I just finished watching a video from Doug Lea where he mentioned
that having asserts can
inhibit inlining due to the additional byte codes. So he sadly
does not use them due to
performance issues.
Does anyone have any insights on this?
Yep.
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2014-August/028450.html
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6316156
yes, sadly, it's sometimes a real problem, here is a thread on
core-lib [1] about removing an assert in Integer.valueOf that allow
JDart to have acceptable perf.
— John
Rémi
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-April/010007.html
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
