On 09/17/2014 08:43 PM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > I don't see anything obviously wrong either with U.dAC() or with > dependency tracking in VM. What we stumbled upon is an inherent > limitation of current dependency tracking implementation.
Yes, and so the question from John, which I need to follow up on, if we need to fix that implementation generically, instead of avoiding the problem with point fixes :) > It's not specific to U.dAC(). Regular class loaders can hit similar > problem as well. Even better, this is even more generic. > If you want to use 8058309 for dependency tracking improvments in VM, > let me know. So far, I got an impression it is about LFs & JSR292 mostly. Yes, please commit the LF fix under the different bug ID, if that is not a hassle? -Aleksey.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
