Thanks, Vladimir!
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 11/19/14, 9:20 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
As far as I can guess :) this change looks good. Reviewed.
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 11/19/14 2:24 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Aleksey, Duncan, thanks for the review and the confirmation that it
doesn't break stuff for you.
Any Reviews, please? :-)
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 11/19/14, 2:23 PM, MacGregor, Duncan (GE Energy Management) wrote:
On 18/11/2014 23:33, "Aleksey Shipilev" <aleksey.shipi...@oracle.com>
wrote:
On 11/19/2014 12:01 AM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8059880/webrev.00/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8059880
Yes, for the love of God, GO FOR IT.
Seconded. Startup of our stuff seems fine now with a compile
threshold of
zero, and it will make stacks so much easier to read in the debugger.
:-)
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
