On Dec 9, 2014, at 12:47 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <vladimir.x.iva...@oracle.com> wrote:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8066746/webrev.00/ > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066746 > Looks ok. Curiously, is there a reason why you chose to use MH.invokeWithArguments rather than MH.invoke/invokeExact? Paul. > Recent changes (8057656 [1]) broke MHs.explicitCastArguments for > VarargsCollector case. It introduced an equivalence check between > MHs.explicitCastArguments and MethodHandle.asType() which doesn't work for > VarargsCollector case as expected. > > VarargsCollector has special asType() implementation, which supports > collecting any number of trailing positional arguments into an array > argument. It doesn't play well with MHs.explicitCastArguments, because the > latter is meant to be a pairwise argument and return type conversion. > > The fix is to ensure that adapted method handle has fixed arity. > > Testing: regression test, jck (api/java_lang/invoke), jdk/java/lang/invoke > > Thanks! > > Best regards, > Vladimir Ivanov > > [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8057656 > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
