On Jan 23, 2015, at 8:00 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <vladimir.x.iva...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Good idea, Peter!
+1 > Updated version: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8069591/webrev.02/ > <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8069591/webrev.02/> Yes, that's good, and you can count me as a reviewer. — John P.S. One could also get rid of the LF.customized field by stuffing both that value and the original LF in the transformCache (as a 2-array), but that's overkill. P.P.S. A possible generalization to the LF.customized field would be an optional list of type, value, and/or structure constraints for one or more arguments to the LF. Then we could (a) customize on additional arguments if we thought that were useful, and/or (b) produce semi-custom code that could be shared by more than one MH, if we thought there was an interesting equivalence class of MHs to speed up with common code.
_______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
