Quick comment.  In this: 
>    MethodHandle h0= constant(boolean.class, true);


…there should a space between h0 and =.

> On Apr 13, 2016, at 5:12 AM, shilpi.rast...@oracle.com wrote:
> 
> Thank You Paul for the suggestions.
> 
> Please review the updated webrev 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~srastogi/8150829/webrev.05 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~srastogi/8150829/webrev.05>
> 
> Thanks,
> Shilpi
> 
> On 4/12/2016 7:32 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Just minor comments, below.
>> 
>> Paul.
>> 
>> 
>> MethodHandle
>> —
>> 
>>  972     /**
>>  973       * Adapts this method handle to be {@linkplain #asVarargsCollector 
>> variable arity}
>>  974       * if the boolean flag is true, else {@linkplain #asFixedArity 
>> fixed arity}.
>>  975       * If the method handle is already of the proper arity mode, it is 
>> returned
>>  976       * unchanged.
>>  977       * <p>This method is sometimes useful when adapting a method 
>> handle that
>>  978       * may be variable arity, to ensure that the resulting adapter is 
>> also
>>  979       * variable arity if and only if the original handle was.  For 
>> example,
>>  980       * this code changes the first argument of a handle
>> 
>> , {@code mh},
>> 
>> to {@code int} without
>>  981       * disturbing its variable arity property:
>>  982       * {@code 
>> mh.asType(mh.type().changeParameterType(0,int.class)).withVarargs(mh.isVarargsCollector())}
>> 
>> The above paragraph can be an @apiNote.
>> 
>> Also can you format the code block over two lines to emphasise the last 
>> call., otherwise i think it is harder to read.
>> 
>> 
>>  983       * @param makeVarargs true if the return method handle should have 
>> variable arity behavior
>>  984       * @return a method handle of the same type, with possibly 
>> adjusted variable arity behavior
>>  985       * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code makeVarargs} is true 
>> and
>>  986       *         this method handle does not have a trailing array 
>> parameter
>>  987       * @since 9
>> 
>> Add
>> 
>> @see #asVarargsCollector
>> @see #asFixedArity
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>>  988      */
>>  989      public MethodHandle withVarargs(boolean makeVarargs) {
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> MethodHandles
>> —
>> 
>> 2387     /** Produces a constant method handle of the requested return type 
>> which
>> 
>> new line after ‘/**'
>> 
>> 
>> 2388      * returns the default value for that type every time it is invoked.
>> 2389      * The resulting constant method handle will have no side effects.
>> 2390      * <p>The returned method handle is equivalent to {@code 
>> empty(methodType(type))}.
>> 2391      * It is also equivalent to {@code 
>> explicitCastArguments(constant(Object.class, null), methodType(type))},
>> 2392      * since {@code explicitCastArguments} converts {@code null} to 
>> default values.
>> 
>> Is this method more efficient than the other two?
> It is existing method made it public and renamed it to zero from zeroHandle.
>> 
>> 
>> 2393      * @param type the expected return type of the desired method handle
>> 2394      * @return a constant method handle that takes no arguments and 
>> returns the default value of the given type (or void, if the type is void)
>> 
>> Can you format to be a little more consistent and not so long on the line 
>> length, as it becomes really tricky read.
>> 
>> 
>> 2395      * @throws NullPointerException if the argument is null
>> 2396      * @see MethodHandles#constant
>> 2397      * @see MethodHandles#empty
>> 2398      * @since 9
>> 2399      */
>> 2400     public static  MethodHandle zero(Class<?> type) {
>> 2401         Objects.requireNonNull(type);
>> 2402         return type.isPrimitive() ?  
>> zero(Wrapper.forPrimitiveType(type), type) : zero(Wrapper.OBJECT, type);
>> 2403     }
>> 2404
>> 
>> 
>> 2409     /**
>> 2410      * Produces a method handle of the requested type which ignores any 
>> arguments, does nothing,
>> 2411      * and returns a suitable default depending on the return type.
>> 2412      * That is, it returns a zero primitive value, a {@code null}, or 
>> {@code void}.
>> 2413      * <p>The returned method handle is equivalent to
>> 2414      * {@code dropArguments(zero(type.returnType()), 0, 
>> type.parameterList())}.
>> 2415      * <p>
>> 2416      * Example:  Given a predicate and target, a useful "if-then" 
>> construct can be constructed as
>> 
>> s/Example:/@apiNote (same applies to the method dropArgumentsToMatch)
>> 
>> s/constructed/produced
>> 
>> 
>> 2417      * {@code guardWithTest(pred, target, empty(target.type())}.
>> 2418      * @param type the type of the desired method handle
>> 2419      * @return a constant method handle of the given type, which 
>> returns a default value of the given return type
>> 2420      * @throws NullPointerException if the argument is null
>> 2421      * @see MethodHandles#zero
>> 2422      * @see MethodHandles#constant
>> 2423      * @since 9
>> 2424      */
>> 2425     public static  MethodHandle empty(MethodType type) {
>> 
>> 
>> 2726 MethodHandle h0= constant(boolean.class, true);
>> 
>> Space before '='
>> 
>> 
>> ConstantIdentityMHTest
>> —
>> 
>> You should test the signatures and values for all primitives, ref and void.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 11 Apr 2016, at 07:47, shilpi.rast...@oracle.com 
>>> <mailto:shilpi.rast...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Gentle Reminder!
>>> 
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject:    RFR [9] 8150829: Enhanced drop-args, identity and default 
>>> constant, varargs adjustment
>>> Date:       Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:18:56 +0530
>>> From:       shilpi.rast...@oracle.com <mailto:shilpi.rast...@oracle.com> 
>>> <shilpi.rast...@oracle.com> <mailto:shilpi.rast...@oracle.com>
>>> Reply-To:   core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net 
>>> <mailto:core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net>
>>> To: mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net <mailto:mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net>
>>> 
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> Please review the following-
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150829 
>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150829>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~srastogi/8150829/webrev.04 
>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~srastogi/8150829/webrev.04>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shilpi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mlvm-dev mailing list
>>> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net <mailto:mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net>
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev 
>>> <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mlvm-dev mailing list
>> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net <mailto:mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net>
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev 
>> <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Reply via email to