The patch titled

     arm: fix IXP4xx CLOCK_TICK_RATE

has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is

     arm-fix-ixp4xx-clock_tick_rate.patch

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are

arm-fix-ixp4xx-clock_tick_rate.patch



From: Deepak Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[RMK is out for the week so sending this direct as it should go into 2.6.13]

As pointed out in the following thread, the CLOCK_TICK_RATE setting for
IXP4xx is incorrect b/c the HW ignores the lowest 2 bits of the LATCH
value.

http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2005-August/030950.html

Tnx to George Anziger and Egil Hjelmeland for finding the issue.

Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

 include/asm-arm/arch-ixp4xx/timex.h |    6 ++++--
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -puN include/asm-arm/arch-ixp4xx/timex.h~arm-fix-ixp4xx-clock_tick_rate 
include/asm-arm/arch-ixp4xx/timex.h
--- devel/include/asm-arm/arch-ixp4xx/timex.h~arm-fix-ixp4xx-clock_tick_rate    
2005-08-26 12:48:16.000000000 -0700
+++ devel-akpm/include/asm-arm/arch-ixp4xx/timex.h      2005-08-26 
12:48:16.000000000 -0700
@@ -7,7 +7,9 @@
 
 /*
  * We use IXP425 General purpose timer for our timer needs, it runs at 
- * 66.66... MHz
+ * 66.66... MHz. We do a convulted calculation of CLOCK_TICK_RATE b/c the
+ * timer register ignores the bottom 2 bits of the LATCH value.
  */
-#define CLOCK_TICK_RATE (66666666)
+#define FREQ 66666666
+#define CLOCK_TICK_RATE (((FREQ / HZ & ~IXP4XX_OST_RELOAD_MASK) + 1) * HZ)
 
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to