The patch titled
lockdep: spin_lock_irqsave_nested()
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
lockdep-spin_lock_irqsave_nested.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: lockdep: spin_lock_irqsave_nested()
From: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Introduce spin_lock_irqsave_nested(); implementation from:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/1/122
Patch from:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/13/258
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: two compile fixes]
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/spinlock.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h | 2 ++
kernel/spinlock.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff -puN include/linux/spinlock.h~lockdep-spin_lock_irqsave_nested
include/linux/spinlock.h
--- a/include/linux/spinlock.h~lockdep-spin_lock_irqsave_nested
+++ a/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -199,6 +199,21 @@ do {
\
BUILD_CHECK_IRQ_FLAGS(flags); \
flags = _write_lock_irqsave(lock); \
} while (0)
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+#define spin_lock_irqsave_nested(lock, flags, subclass)
\
+ do { \
+ BUILD_CHECK_IRQ_FLAGS(flags); \
+ flags = _spin_lock_irqsave_nested(lock, subclass); \
+ } while (0)
+#else
+#define spin_lock_irqsave_nested(lock, flags, subclass)
\
+ do { \
+ BUILD_CHECK_IRQ_FLAGS(flags); \
+ flags = _spin_lock_irqsave(lock); \
+ } while (0)
+#endif
+
#else
#define spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags) \
do { \
@@ -215,6 +230,9 @@ do {
\
BUILD_CHECK_IRQ_FLAGS(flags); \
_write_lock_irqsave(lock, flags); \
} while (0)
+#define spin_lock_irqsave_nested(lock, flags, subclass) \
+ spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)
+
#endif
#define spin_lock_irq(lock) _spin_lock_irq(lock)
diff -puN include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h~lockdep-spin_lock_irqsave_nested
include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
--- a/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h~lockdep-spin_lock_irqsave_nested
+++ a/include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ void __lockfunc _read_lock_irq(rwlock_t
void __lockfunc _write_lock_irq(rwlock_t *lock)
__acquires(lock);
unsigned long __lockfunc _spin_lock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock)
__acquires(lock);
+unsigned long __lockfunc _spin_lock_irqsave_nested(spinlock_t *lock, int
subclass)
+ __acquires(lock);
unsigned long __lockfunc _read_lock_irqsave(rwlock_t *lock)
__acquires(lock);
unsigned long __lockfunc _write_lock_irqsave(rwlock_t *lock)
diff -puN kernel/spinlock.c~lockdep-spin_lock_irqsave_nested kernel/spinlock.c
--- a/kernel/spinlock.c~lockdep-spin_lock_irqsave_nested
+++ a/kernel/spinlock.c
@@ -293,6 +293,27 @@ void __lockfunc _spin_lock_nested(spinlo
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_spin_lock_nested);
+unsigned long __lockfunc _spin_lock_irqsave_nested(spinlock_t *lock, int
subclass)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ preempt_disable();
+ spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
+ /*
+ * On lockdep we dont want the hand-coded irq-enable of
+ * _raw_spin_lock_flags() code, because lockdep assumes
+ * that interrupts are not re-enabled during lock-acquire:
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_SPIN_LOCKING
+ _raw_spin_lock(lock);
+#else
+ _raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, &flags);
+#endif
+ return flags;
+}
+
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(_spin_lock_irqsave_nested);
#endif
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are
origin.patch
binfmt_elf-randomize-pie-binaries.patch
make-initramfs-printk-a-warning-on-incorrect-cpio-type.patch
remove-the-old-bd_mutex-lockdep-annotation.patch
new-bd_mutex-lockdep-annotation.patch
round_jiffies-infrastructure.patch
round_jiffies-infrastructure-fix.patch
user-of-the-jiffies-rounding-patch-ata-subsystem.patch
user-of-the-jiffies-rounding-code-jbd.patch
user-of-the-jiffies-rounding-code-networking.patch
user-of-the-jiffies-rounding-patch-slab.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
