The patch titled
     Cleanup: Unify tsc_unstable and tsc_disable
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     cleanup-unify-tsc_unstable-and-tsc_disable.patch

This patch was dropped because dropping the pther patch broke it

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Cleanup: Unify tsc_unstable and tsc_disable
From: "Guillaume Chazarain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

tsc_unstable and tsc_disable serve the same purpose.

Signed-off-by: Guillaume Chazarain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: john stultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

 arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c |   26 ++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c~cleanup-unify-tsc_unstable-and-tsc_disable 
arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c~cleanup-unify-tsc_unstable-and-tsc_disable
+++ a/arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -50,16 +50,6 @@ static int __init tsc_setup(char *str)
 
 __setup("notsc", tsc_setup);
 
-/*
- * code to mark and check if the TSC is unstable
- * due to cpufreq or due to unsynced TSCs
- */
-static int tsc_unstable;
-
-static inline int check_tsc_unstable(void)
-{
-       return tsc_unstable;
-}
 
 /* Accellerators for sched_clock()
  * convert from cycles(64bits) => nanoseconds (64bits)
@@ -106,7 +96,7 @@ unsigned long long sched_clock(void)
        /*
         * Fall back to jiffies if there's no TSC available:
         */
-       if (tsc_unstable || unlikely(tsc_disable))
+       if (unlikely(tsc_disable))
                /* No locking but a rare wrong value is not a big deal: */
                return (jiffies_64 - INITIAL_JIFFIES) * (1000000000 / HZ);
 
@@ -282,8 +272,8 @@ static struct clocksource clocksource_ts
 
 void mark_tsc_unstable(void)
 {
-       if (!tsc_unstable) {
-               tsc_unstable = 1;
+       if (!tsc_disable) {
+               tsc_disable = 1;
                /* Can be called before registration */
                if (clocksource_tsc.mult)
                        clocksource_change_rating(&clocksource_tsc, 0);
@@ -297,7 +287,7 @@ static int __init dmi_mark_tsc_unstable(
 {
        printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s detected: marking TSC unstable.\n",
                       d->ident);
-       tsc_unstable = 1;
+       tsc_disable = 1;
        return 0;
 }
 
@@ -320,7 +310,7 @@ static struct dmi_system_id __initdata b
  */
 __cpuinit int unsynchronized_tsc(void)
 {
-       if (!cpu_has_tsc || tsc_unstable)
+       if (!cpu_has_tsc || tsc_disable)
                return 1;
        /*
         * Intel systems are normally all synchronized.
@@ -329,9 +319,9 @@ __cpuinit int unsynchronized_tsc(void)
        if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL) {
                /* assume multi socket systems are not synchronized: */
                if (num_possible_cpus() > 1)
-                       tsc_unstable = 1;
+                       tsc_disable = 1;
        }
-       return tsc_unstable;
+       return tsc_disable;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -381,7 +371,7 @@ void __init tsc_init(void)
        clocksource_tsc.mult = clocksource_khz2mult(current_tsc_khz,
                                                        clocksource_tsc.shift);
        /* lower the rating if we already know its unstable: */
-       if (check_tsc_unstable()) {
+       if (tsc_disable) {
                clocksource_tsc.rating = 0;
                clocksource_tsc.flags &= ~CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS;
        }
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are

cleanup-unify-tsc_unstable-and-tsc_disable.patch
possible-bugfix-make-dmi_mark_tsc_unstable-call-mark_tsc_unstable.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to