The patch titled
signalfd-retrieve-multiple-signals-with-one-read-call tidy
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
signalfd-retrieve-multiple-signals-with-one-read-call-tidy.patch
This patch was dropped because it was folded into
signalfd-retrieve-multiple-signals-with-one-read-call.patch
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: signalfd-retrieve-multiple-signals-with-one-read-call tidy
From: Davi Arnaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Simplify signalfd locking following suggestions by Oleg Nesterov.
Signed-off-by: Davi E. M. Arnaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/signalfd.c | 17 ++++++-----------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff -puN
fs/signalfd.c~signalfd-retrieve-multiple-signals-with-one-read-call-tidy
fs/signalfd.c
--- a/fs/signalfd.c~signalfd-retrieve-multiple-signals-with-one-read-call-tidy
+++ a/fs/signalfd.c
@@ -211,13 +211,11 @@ static int signalfd_copyinfo(struct sign
static ssize_t signalfd_dequeue(struct signalfd_ctx *ctx, siginfo_t *info,
int nonblock)
{
- int locked;
ssize_t ret;
struct signalfd_lockctx lk;
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
- locked = signalfd_lock(ctx, &lk);
- if (!locked)
+ if (!signalfd_lock(ctx, &lk))
return 0;
ret = dequeue_signal(lk.tsk, &ctx->sigmask, info);
@@ -235,24 +233,24 @@ static ssize_t signalfd_dequeue(struct s
for (;;) {
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
ret = dequeue_signal(lk.tsk, &ctx->sigmask, info);
+ signalfd_unlock(&lk);
if (ret != 0)
break;
if (signal_pending(current)) {
ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
break;
}
- signalfd_unlock(&lk);
schedule();
- locked = signalfd_lock(ctx, &lk);
- if (unlikely(!locked)) {
+ ret = signalfd_lock(ctx, &lk);
+ if (unlikely(!ret)) {
/*
* Let the caller read zero byte, ala socket
* recv() when the peer disconnect. This test
* must be done before doing a dequeue_signal(),
* because if the sighand has been orphaned,
- * the dequeue_signal() call is going to crash.
+ * the dequeue_signal() call is going to crash
+ * because ->sighand will be long gone.
*/
- ret = 0;
break;
}
}
@@ -260,9 +258,6 @@ static ssize_t signalfd_dequeue(struct s
remove_wait_queue(&ctx->wqh, &wait);
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
- if (likely(locked))
- signalfd_unlock(&lk);
-
return ret;
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are
signalfd-retrieve-multiple-signals-with-one-read-call.patch
signalfd-retrieve-multiple-signals-with-one-read-call-tidy.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
