The patch titled
     use mutex instead of semaphore in Virtual Video driver
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     use-mutex-instead-of-semaphore-in-virtual-video-driver.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: use mutex instead of semaphore in Virtual Video driver
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

The Virtual Video driver uses a semaphore as mutex.  Use the mutex API instead
of the (binary) semaphore.

Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

 drivers/media/video/vivi.c |   15 ++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff -puN 
drivers/media/video/vivi.c~use-mutex-instead-of-semaphore-in-virtual-video-driver
 drivers/media/video/vivi.c
--- 
a/drivers/media/video/vivi.c~use-mutex-instead-of-semaphore-in-virtual-video-driver
+++ a/drivers/media/video/vivi.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/random.h>
 #include <linux/version.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/videodev2.h>
 #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
 #ifdef CONFIG_VIDEO_V4L1_COMPAT
@@ -165,7 +166,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(vivi_devlist);
 struct vivi_dev {
        struct list_head           vivi_devlist;
 
-       struct semaphore           lock;
+       struct mutex               lock;
 
        int                        users;
 
@@ -738,16 +739,16 @@ static struct videobuf_queue_ops vivi_vi
 static int res_get(struct vivi_dev *dev, struct vivi_fh *fh)
 {
        /* is it free? */
-       down(&dev->lock);
+       mutex_lock(&dev->lock);
        if (dev->resources) {
                /* no, someone else uses it */
-               up(&dev->lock);
+               mutex_unlock(&dev->lock);
                return 0;
        }
        /* it's free, grab it */
        dev->resources =1;
        dprintk(1,"res: get\n");
-       up(&dev->lock);
+       mutex_unlock(&dev->lock);
        return 1;
 }
 
@@ -758,10 +759,10 @@ static int res_locked(struct vivi_dev *d
 
 static void res_free(struct vivi_dev *dev, struct vivi_fh *fh)
 {
-       down(&dev->lock);
+       mutex_lock(&dev->lock);
        dev->resources = 0;
        dprintk(1,"res: put\n");
-       up(&dev->lock);
+       mutex_lock(&dev->lock);
 }
 
 /* ------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -1260,7 +1261,7 @@ static int __init vivi_init(void)
        init_waitqueue_head(&dev->vidq.wq);
 
        /* initialize locks */
-       init_MUTEX(&dev->lock);
+       mutex_init(&dev->lock);
 
        dev->vidq.timeout.function = vivi_vid_timeout;
        dev->vidq.timeout.data     = (unsigned long)dev;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are

kcopyd-use-mutex-instead-of-semaphore.patch
git-dvb.patch
git-mtd.patch
git-netdev-all.patch
use-mutex-instead-of-semaphore-in-vlsi-82c147-irda-controller-driver.patch
use-mutex-instead-of-semaphore-in-megaraid-mailbox-driver.patch
block-device-elevator-use-list_for_each_entry-instead-of-list_for_each.patch
videopix-frame-grabber-fix-unreleased-lock-in-vfc_debug.patch
drivers-block-ubc-use-list_for_each_entry.patch
use-list_for_each_entry-for-iteration-in-prism-54-driver.patch
use-mutexes-instead-of-semaphores-in-i2o-driver.patch
fs-block_devc-use-list_for_each_entry.patch
use-mutex-instead-of-semaphore-in-capi-20-driver.patch
drivers-edac-change-from-semaphore-to-mutex-operation.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to