The patch titled
     AFS: use patched rxrpc_kernel_send_data() correctly
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     afs-use-patched-rxrpc_kernel_send_data-correctly.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: AFS: use patched rxrpc_kernel_send_data() correctly
From: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Fix afs_send_simple_reply() to accept a greater-than-zero return value from
rxrpc_kernel_send_data() as being a successful return rather than thinking
it an error and aborting the call.

rxrpc_kernel_send_data() previously returned zero incorrectly when it
worked successfully, but has been patched to return the number of bytes it
transmitted.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

 fs/afs/rxrpc.c |   21 ++++++++++-----------
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/afs/rxrpc.c~afs-use-patched-rxrpc_kernel_send_data-correctly 
fs/afs/rxrpc.c
--- a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c~afs-use-patched-rxrpc_kernel_send_data-correctly
+++ a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
@@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ void afs_send_simple_reply(struct afs_ca
 {
        struct msghdr msg;
        struct iovec iov[1];
+       int n;
 
        _enter("");
 
@@ -806,22 +807,20 @@ void afs_send_simple_reply(struct afs_ca
        msg.msg_flags           = 0;
 
        call->state = AFS_CALL_AWAIT_ACK;
-       switch (rxrpc_kernel_send_data(call->rxcall, &msg, len)) {
-       case 0:
+       n = rxrpc_kernel_send_data(call->rxcall, &msg, len);
+       if (n >= 0) {
                _leave(" [replied]");
                return;
-
-       case -ENOMEM:
+       }
+       if (n == -ENOMEM) {
                _debug("oom");
                rxrpc_kernel_abort_call(call->rxcall, RX_USER_ABORT);
-       default:
-               rxrpc_kernel_end_call(call->rxcall);
-               call->rxcall = NULL;
-               call->type->destructor(call);
-               afs_free_call(call);
-               _leave(" [error]");
-               return;
        }
+       rxrpc_kernel_end_call(call->rxcall);
+       call->rxcall = NULL;
+       call->type->destructor(call);
+       afs_free_call(call);
+       _leave(" [error]");
 }
 
 /*
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are

origin.patch
frv-fix-linkage-problems.patch
nommu-vmalloc_32_user-vm_insert_page-and-symbol-exports.patch
nommu-present-backing-device-capabilities-for-mtd.patch
nommu-add-support-for-direct-mapping-through-mtdconcat.patch
afs-fix-file-locking.patch
mutex-subsystem-synchro-test-module.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to