The patch titled
     fs/locks.c: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     fs-locksc-use-list_for_each_entry-instead-of-list_for_each.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: fs/locks.c: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

fs/locks.c: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each() in
posix_locks_deadlock() and get_locks_status()

Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

 fs/locks.c |   17 +++++++----------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/locks.c~fs-locksc-use-list_for_each_entry-instead-of-list_for_each 
fs/locks.c
--- a/fs/locks.c~fs-locksc-use-list_for_each_entry-instead-of-list_for_each
+++ a/fs/locks.c
@@ -700,13 +700,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(posix_test_lock);
 static int posix_locks_deadlock(struct file_lock *caller_fl,
                                struct file_lock *block_fl)
 {
-       struct list_head *tmp;
+       struct file_lock *fl;
 
 next_task:
        if (posix_same_owner(caller_fl, block_fl))
                return 1;
-       list_for_each(tmp, &blocked_list) {
-               struct file_lock *fl = list_entry(tmp, struct file_lock, 
fl_link);
+       list_for_each_entry(fl, &blocked_list, fl_link) {
                if (posix_same_owner(fl, block_fl)) {
                        fl = fl->fl_next;
                        block_fl = fl;
@@ -2170,24 +2169,22 @@ static void move_lock_status(char **p, o
 
 int get_locks_status(char *buffer, char **start, off_t offset, int length)
 {
-       struct list_head *tmp;
+       struct file_lock *fl;
        char *q = buffer;
        off_t pos = 0;
        int i = 0;
 
        lock_kernel();
-       list_for_each(tmp, &file_lock_list) {
-               struct list_head *btmp;
-               struct file_lock *fl = list_entry(tmp, struct file_lock, 
fl_link);
+       list_for_each_entry(fl, &file_lock_list, fl_link) {
+               struct file_lock *bfl;
+
                lock_get_status(q, fl, ++i, "");
                move_lock_status(&q, &pos, offset);
 
                if(pos >= offset+length)
                        goto done;
 
-               list_for_each(btmp, &fl->fl_block) {
-                       struct file_lock *bfl = list_entry(btmp,
-                                       struct file_lock, fl_block);
+               list_for_each_entry(bfl, &fl->fl_block, fl_block) {
                        lock_get_status(q, bfl, i, " ->");
                        move_lock_status(&q, &pos, offset);
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are

git-alsa.patch
generic-ac97-mixer-modem-oss-use-list_for_each_entry.patch
git-dvb.patch
git-mtd.patch
git-net.patch
git-nfsd.patch
git-sched.patch
git-scsi-misc.patch
use-mutex-instead-of-semaphore-in-isdn-subsystem-common-functions.patch
fs-file_tablec-use-list_for_each_entry-instead-of-list_for_each.patch
fs-eventpollc-use-list_for_each_entry-instead-of-list_for_each.patch
fs-superc-use-list_for_each_entry-instead-of-list_for_each.patch
fs-superc-use-list_for_each_entry-instead-of-list_for_each-fix.patch
kernel-exitc-use-list_for_each_entry_safe-instead-of-list_for_each_safe.patch
kernel-time-clocksourcec-use-list_for_each_entry-instead-of-list_for_each.patch
mm-oom_killc-use-list_for_each_entry-instead-of-list_for_each.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to