The patch titled
     lockdep: fix mismatched lockdep_depth/curr_chain_hash
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     lockdep-fix-mismatched-lockdep_depth-curr_chain_hash.patch

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: lockdep: fix mismatched lockdep_depth/curr_chain_hash
From: Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

It is possible for the current->curr_chain_key to become inconsistent with
the current index if the chain fails to validate.  The end result is that
future lock_acquire() operations may inadvertently fail to find a hit in
the cache resulting in a new node being added to the graph for every
acquire.

[ peterz: this might explain some of the lockdep is so _slow_ complaints. ]
[ mingo: this does not impact the correctness of validation, but may slow
  down future operations significantly, if the chain gets very long. ]

Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---


diff -puN kernel/lockdep.c~lockdep-fix-mismatched-lockdep_depth-curr_chain_hash 
kernel/lockdep.c
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c~lockdep-fix-mismatched-lockdep_depth-curr_chain_hash
+++ a/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ cache_hit:
 }
 
 static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
-               struct held_lock *hlock, int chain_head)
+               struct held_lock *hlock, int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
 {
        /*
         * Trylock needs to maintain the stack of held locks, but it
@@ -1534,7 +1534,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_st
         * graph_lock for us)
         */
        if (!hlock->trylock && (hlock->check == 2) &&
-                       lookup_chain_cache(curr->curr_chain_key, hlock->class)) 
{
+                       lookup_chain_cache(chain_key, hlock->class)) {
                /*
                 * Check whether last held lock:
                 *
@@ -1576,7 +1576,7 @@ static int validate_chain(struct task_st
 #else
 static inline int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
                struct lockdep_map *lock, struct held_lock *hlock,
-               int chain_head)
+               int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
 {
        return 1;
 }
@@ -2450,11 +2450,11 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep
                chain_head = 1;
        }
        chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, id);
-       curr->curr_chain_key = chain_key;
 
-       if (!validate_chain(curr, lock, hlock, chain_head))
+       if (!validate_chain(curr, lock, hlock, chain_head, chain_key))
                return 0;
 
+       curr->curr_chain_key = chain_key;
        curr->lockdep_depth++;
        check_chain_key(curr);
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are

git-kvm.patch
lockdep-fix-mismatched-lockdep_depth-curr_chain_hash.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to