The patch titled
sparsemem: record when a section has a valid mem_map
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
sparsemem-record-when-a-section-has-a-valid-mem_map.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: sparsemem: record when a section has a valid mem_map
From: Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We have flags to indicate whether a section actually has a valid mem_map
associated with it. This is never set and we rely solely on the present bit
to indicate a section is valid. By definition a section is not valid if it
has no mem_map and there is a window during init where the present bit is set
but there is no mem_map, during which pfn_valid() will return true
incorrectly.
Use the existing SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP flag to indicate the presence of a valid
mem_map. Switch valid_section{,_nr} and pfn_valid() to this bit. Add a new
present_section{,_nr} and pfn_present() interfaces for those users who care to
know that a section is going to be valid.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: coding-syle fixes]
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/base/memory.c | 6 +++---
include/linux/mmzone.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
mm/sparse.c | 9 +++++----
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff -puN
drivers/base/memory.c~sparsemem-record-when-a-section-has-a-valid-mem_map
drivers/base/memory.c
--- a/drivers/base/memory.c~sparsemem-record-when-a-section-has-a-valid-mem_map
+++ a/drivers/base/memory.c
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ store_mem_state(struct sys_device *dev,
mem = container_of(dev, struct memory_block, sysdev);
phys_section_nr = mem->phys_index;
- if (!valid_section_nr(phys_section_nr))
+ if (!present_section_nr(phys_section_nr))
goto out;
if (!strncmp(buf, "online", min((int)count, 6)))
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ int register_new_memory(struct mem_secti
int unregister_memory_section(struct mem_section *section)
{
- if (!valid_section(section))
+ if (!present_section(section))
return -EINVAL;
return remove_memory_block(0, section, 0);
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ int __init memory_dev_init(void)
* during boot and have been initialized
*/
for (i = 0; i < NR_MEM_SECTIONS; i++) {
- if (!valid_section_nr(i))
+ if (!present_section_nr(i))
continue;
err = add_memory_block(0, __nr_to_section(i), MEM_ONLINE, 0);
if (!ret)
diff -puN
include/linux/mmzone.h~sparsemem-record-when-a-section-has-a-valid-mem_map
include/linux/mmzone.h
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h~sparsemem-record-when-a-section-has-a-valid-mem_map
+++ a/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -771,12 +771,17 @@ static inline struct page *__section_mem
return (struct page *)map;
}
-static inline int valid_section(struct mem_section *section)
+static inline int present_section(struct mem_section *section)
{
return (section && (section->section_mem_map & SECTION_MARKED_PRESENT));
}
-static inline int section_has_mem_map(struct mem_section *section)
+static inline int present_section_nr(unsigned long nr)
+{
+ return present_section(__nr_to_section(nr));
+}
+
+static inline int valid_section(struct mem_section *section)
{
return (section && (section->section_mem_map & SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP));
}
@@ -798,6 +803,13 @@ static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned lon
return valid_section(__nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn)));
}
+static inline int pfn_present(unsigned long pfn)
+{
+ if (pfn_to_section_nr(pfn) >= NR_MEM_SECTIONS)
+ return 0;
+ return present_section(__nr_to_section(pfn_to_section_nr(pfn)));
+}
+
/*
* These are _only_ used during initialisation, therefore they
* can use __initdata ... They could have names to indicate
diff -puN mm/sparse.c~sparsemem-record-when-a-section-has-a-valid-mem_map
mm/sparse.c
--- a/mm/sparse.c~sparsemem-record-when-a-section-has-a-valid-mem_map
+++ a/mm/sparse.c
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ unsigned long __init node_memmap_size_by
if (nid != early_pfn_to_nid(pfn))
continue;
- if (pfn_valid(pfn))
+ if (pfn_present(pfn))
nr_pages += PAGES_PER_SECTION;
}
@@ -206,11 +206,12 @@ struct page *sparse_decode_mem_map(unsig
static int __meminit sparse_init_one_section(struct mem_section *ms,
unsigned long pnum, struct page *mem_map)
{
- if (!valid_section(ms))
+ if (!present_section(ms))
return -EINVAL;
ms->section_mem_map &= ~SECTION_MAP_MASK;
- ms->section_mem_map |= sparse_encode_mem_map(mem_map, pnum);
+ ms->section_mem_map |= sparse_encode_mem_map(mem_map, pnum) |
+ SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP;
return 1;
}
@@ -256,7 +257,7 @@ void __init sparse_init(void)
struct page *map;
for (pnum = 0; pnum < NR_MEM_SECTIONS; pnum++) {
- if (!valid_section_nr(pnum))
+ if (!present_section_nr(pnum))
continue;
map = sparse_early_mem_map_alloc(pnum);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are
origin.patch
dma-use-dev_to_node-to-get-node-for-device-in-dma_alloc_pages.patch
update-checkpatchpl-to-version-010.patch
printk-add-kern_cont-annotation.patch
page-owner-tracking-leak-detector.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
