The patch titled
atomic_ops.txt: mention local_t
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
atomic_opstxt-mention-local_t.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: atomic_ops.txt: mention local_t
From: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
local_t is a variant of atomic_t and has related ops to match.
Add reference for local_t documentation to atomic_ops.txt.
Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/atomic_ops.txt | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff -puN Documentation/atomic_ops.txt~atomic_opstxt-mention-local_t
Documentation/atomic_ops.txt
--- a/Documentation/atomic_ops.txt~atomic_opstxt-mention-local_t
+++ a/Documentation/atomic_ops.txt
@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ suffice:
typedef struct { volatile int counter; } atomic_t;
+local_t is very similar to atomic_t. If the counter is per CPU and only
+updated by one CPU, local_t is probably more appropriate. Please see
+Documentation/local_ops.txt for the semantics of local_t.
+
The first operations to implement for atomic_t's are the
initializers and plain reads.
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are
origin.patch
pa-risc-use-page-allocator-instead-of-slab-allocator.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
