The patch titled
     libata: don't fail ata device revalidation for bad _GTF methods
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     libata-dont-fail-ata-device-revalidation-for-bad-_gtf-methods.patch

*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: libata: don't fail ata device revalidation for bad _GTF methods
From: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Experience suggests that the _GTF method may be bad.  We currently fail
device revalidation in that case, which seems excessive.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

 drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c |   10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff -puN 
drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c~libata-dont-fail-ata-device-revalidation-for-bad-_gtf-methods
 drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
--- 
a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c~libata-dont-fail-ata-device-revalidation-for-bad-_gtf-methods
+++ a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_acpi_stm);
  *
  * RETURNS:
  * Number of taskfiles on success, 0 if _GTF doesn't exist or doesn't
- * contain valid data.  -errno on other errors.
+ * contain valid data.
  */
 static int ata_dev_get_GTF(struct ata_device *dev, struct ata_acpi_gtf **gtf,
                           void **ptr_to_free)
@@ -339,7 +339,6 @@ static int ata_dev_get_GTF(struct ata_de
                        ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING,
                                       "_GTF evaluation failed (AE 0x%x)\n",
                                       status);
-                       rc = -EIO;
                }
                goto out_free;
        }
@@ -359,7 +358,6 @@ static int ata_dev_get_GTF(struct ata_de
                ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING,
                               "_GTF unexpected object type 0x%x\n",
                               out_obj->type);
-               rc = -EINVAL;
                goto out_free;
        }
 
@@ -367,7 +365,6 @@ static int ata_dev_get_GTF(struct ata_de
                ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING,
                               "unexpected _GTF length (%d)\n",
                               out_obj->buffer.length);
-               rc = -EINVAL;
                goto out_free;
        }
 
@@ -511,10 +508,7 @@ static int ata_acpi_exec_tfs(struct ata_
        int gtf_count, i, rc;
 
        /* get taskfiles */
-       rc = ata_dev_get_GTF(dev, &gtf, &ptr_to_free);
-       if (rc < 0)
-               return rc;
-       gtf_count = rc;
+       gtf_count = ata_dev_get_GTF(dev, &gtf, &ptr_to_free);
 
        /* execute them */
        for (i = 0, rc = 0; i < gtf_count; i++) {
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are

working-3d-dri-intel-agpko-resume-for-i815-chip.patch
libata-dont-fail-ata-device-revalidation-for-bad-_gtf-methods.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to