The patch titled
     RTC: assure proper memory ordering with respect to RTC_DEV_BUSY flag
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     rtc-assure-proper-memory-ordering-with-respect-to-rtc_dev_busy-flag.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RTC: assure proper memory ordering with respect to RTC_DEV_BUSY flag
From: Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

We must make sure that the RTC_DEV_BUSY flag has proper lock semantics,
i.e.  that the RTC_DEV_BUSY stores clearing the flag don't get reordered
before the preceeding stores and loads and vice versa.

Spotted by Nick Piggin.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---

 drivers/rtc/interface.c |    4 ++--
 drivers/rtc/rtc-dev.c   |    6 +++---
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff -puN 
drivers/rtc/interface.c~rtc-assure-proper-memory-ordering-with-respect-to-rtc_dev_busy-flag
 drivers/rtc/interface.c
--- 
a/drivers/rtc/interface.c~rtc-assure-proper-memory-ordering-with-respect-to-rtc_dev_busy-flag
+++ a/drivers/rtc/interface.c
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ int rtc_irq_register(struct rtc_device *
                return -EINVAL;
 
        /* Cannot register while the char dev is in use */
-       if (test_and_set_bit(RTC_DEV_BUSY, &rtc->flags))
+       if (test_and_set_bit_lock(RTC_DEV_BUSY, &rtc->flags))
                return -EBUSY;
 
        spin_lock_irq(&rtc->irq_task_lock);
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ int rtc_irq_register(struct rtc_device *
        }
        spin_unlock_irq(&rtc->irq_task_lock);
 
-       clear_bit(RTC_DEV_BUSY, &rtc->flags);
+       clear_bit_unlock(RTC_DEV_BUSY, &rtc->flags);
 
        return retval;
 }
diff -puN 
drivers/rtc/rtc-dev.c~rtc-assure-proper-memory-ordering-with-respect-to-rtc_dev_busy-flag
 drivers/rtc/rtc-dev.c
--- 
a/drivers/rtc/rtc-dev.c~rtc-assure-proper-memory-ordering-with-respect-to-rtc_dev_busy-flag
+++ a/drivers/rtc/rtc-dev.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static int rtc_dev_open(struct inode *in
                                        struct rtc_device, char_dev);
        const struct rtc_class_ops *ops = rtc->ops;
 
-       if (test_and_set_bit(RTC_DEV_BUSY, &rtc->flags))
+       if (test_and_set_bit_lock(RTC_DEV_BUSY, &rtc->flags))
                return -EBUSY;
 
        file->private_data = rtc;
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static int rtc_dev_open(struct inode *in
        }
 
        /* something has gone wrong */
-       clear_bit(RTC_DEV_BUSY, &rtc->flags);
+       clear_bit_unlock(RTC_DEV_BUSY, &rtc->flags);
        return err;
 }
 
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static int rtc_dev_release(struct inode 
        if (rtc->ops->release)
                rtc->ops->release(rtc->dev.parent);
 
-       clear_bit(RTC_DEV_BUSY, &rtc->flags);
+       clear_bit_unlock(RTC_DEV_BUSY, &rtc->flags);
        return 0;
 }
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are

origin.patch
git-hid.patch
hid-the-bit-in-hidinput_mapping_quirks-is-an-out-parameter.patch
fujitsu-application-panel-driver.patch
apanel-free-input-device-on-close.patch
apanel-change-name-of-led.patch
apanel-detach-on-shutdown.patch
apanel-use-generic-keycode-routines.patch
elantech-touchpad-driver.patch
git-ipwireless_cs.patch
git-x86.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to