The patch titled
buffer_head: fix private_list handling
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
buffer_head-fix-private_list-handling.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: buffer_head: fix private_list handling
From: Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
There are two possible races in handling of private_list in buffer cache.
1) When fsync_buffers_list() processes a private_list, it clears
b_assoc_mapping and moves buffer to its private list. Now
drop_buffers() comes, sees a buffer is on list so it calls
__remove_assoc_queue() which complains about b_assoc_mapping being
cleared (as it cannot propagate possible IO error). This race has been
actually observed in the wild.
2) When fsync_buffers_list() processes a private_list,
mark_buffer_dirty_inode() can be called on bh which is already on the
private list of fsync_buffers_list(). As buffer is on some list (note
that the check is performed without private_lock), it is not readded to
the mapping's private_list and after fsync_buffers_list() finishes, we
have a dirty buffer which should be on private_list but it isn't. This
race has not been reported, probably because most (but not all) callers
of mark_buffer_dirty_inode() hold i_mutex and thus are serialized with
fsync().
Fix these issues by not clearing b_assoc_map when fsync_buffers_list()
moves buffer to a dedicated list and by reinserting buffer in private_list
when it is found dirty after we have submitted buffer for IO. We also
change the tests whether a buffer is on a private list from
!list_empty(&bh->b_assoc_buffers) to bh->b_assoc_map so that they are
single word reads and hence lockless checks are safe.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/buffer.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/buffer.c~buffer_head-fix-private_list-handling fs/buffer.c
--- a/fs/buffer.c~buffer_head-fix-private_list-handling
+++ a/fs/buffer.c
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ void mark_buffer_dirty_inode(struct buff
} else {
BUG_ON(mapping->assoc_mapping != buffer_mapping);
}
- if (list_empty(&bh->b_assoc_buffers)) {
+ if (!bh->b_assoc_map) {
spin_lock(&buffer_mapping->private_lock);
list_move_tail(&bh->b_assoc_buffers,
&mapping->private_list);
@@ -794,6 +794,7 @@ static int fsync_buffers_list(spinlock_t
{
struct buffer_head *bh;
struct list_head tmp;
+ struct address_space *mapping;
int err = 0, err2;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmp);
@@ -801,9 +802,14 @@ static int fsync_buffers_list(spinlock_t
spin_lock(lock);
while (!list_empty(list)) {
bh = BH_ENTRY(list->next);
+ mapping = bh->b_assoc_map;
__remove_assoc_queue(bh);
+ /* Avoid race with mark_buffer_dirty_inode() which does
+ * a lockless check and we rely on seeing the dirty bit */
+ smp_mb();
if (buffer_dirty(bh) || buffer_locked(bh)) {
list_add(&bh->b_assoc_buffers, &tmp);
+ bh->b_assoc_map = mapping;
if (buffer_dirty(bh)) {
get_bh(bh);
spin_unlock(lock);
@@ -822,8 +828,17 @@ static int fsync_buffers_list(spinlock_t
while (!list_empty(&tmp)) {
bh = BH_ENTRY(tmp.prev);
- list_del_init(&bh->b_assoc_buffers);
get_bh(bh);
+ mapping = bh->b_assoc_map;
+ __remove_assoc_queue(bh);
+ /* Avoid race with mark_buffer_dirty_inode() which does
+ * a lockless check and we rely on seeing the dirty bit */
+ smp_mb();
+ if (buffer_dirty(bh)) {
+ list_add(&bh->b_assoc_buffers,
+ &bh->b_assoc_map->private_list);
+ bh->b_assoc_map = mapping;
+ }
spin_unlock(lock);
wait_on_buffer(bh);
if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))
@@ -1195,7 +1210,7 @@ void __brelse(struct buffer_head * buf)
void __bforget(struct buffer_head *bh)
{
clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
- if (!list_empty(&bh->b_assoc_buffers)) {
+ if (bh->b_assoc_map) {
struct address_space *buffer_mapping = bh->b_page->mapping;
spin_lock(&buffer_mapping->private_lock);
@@ -3022,7 +3037,7 @@ drop_buffers(struct page *page, struct b
do {
struct buffer_head *next = bh->b_this_page;
- if (!list_empty(&bh->b_assoc_buffers))
+ if (bh->b_assoc_map)
__remove_assoc_queue(bh);
bh = next;
} while (bh != head);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are
origin.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe mm-commits" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
