On Sunday 26 October 2008 18:52:15 RetypePassword wrote: > On Oct 26, 10:11 am, Peter Bienstman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It does something similar, but with cards with grades 0 and 1. > > So basically, you've combined steps 6 and 7 of SM-2 and applied step 7 > (last step) only to cards graded 0 or 1. It seems more efficient; > what's the point of repeating something if you can recall it in the > first place, even if doing so requires a lot of effort. But therein > lies the question: Once the user successfully recalls a card, even > with much effort, will it be remembered until the next repetition or > is reinforcement necessary?
That's what the scheduling algorithm is supposed to take care off. Note that all of this is not an exact science, so don't expect miracles :-) Peter > > Cheers, > > > > Peter > > > > On Sunday 26 October 2008 17:58:14 RetypePassword wrote: > > > I just started using Mnemosyne recently; I've had it installed for a > > > while, but I haven't gotten around to using it because I wanted more > > > portability. Trying to get more portability by using index cards and > > > the SM-2 algorithm isn't exactly pleasant. Anyhow, in my attempt, I > > > had to learn the SM-2 algorithm. I've read, and I think I understand > > > fairly well, the SM-2 and SM-5 algorithms as presented on SuperMemo's > > > website. > > > > > > When I finally began using Mnemosyne, I expected it to do the last > > > step of the SM-2 algorithm: Repeat all the cards that scored less than > > > a four without changing the grade (for interval calculation purposes) > > > initially given that day until all cards have a score of four. It > > > didn't. I was confused. I scored most of my cards a three — some had > > > fours and only one got a five, but Mnemosyne didn't repeat the cards I > > > gave a three. > > > > > > Is this skipping of the last step an intentional modification of the > > > SM-2 algorithm and could it have a detrimental effect on how well I > > > recall items in future repetitions? > > > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------ > > Peter Bienstman > > Ghent University, Dept. of Information Technology > > Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, B-9000 Gent, Belgium > > tel: +32 9 264 34 46, fax: +32 9 264 35 93 > > WWW:http://photonics.intec.UGent.be > > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ------------------------------------------------ > > -- ------------------------------------------------ Peter Bienstman Ghent University, Dept. of Information Technology Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, B-9000 Gent, Belgium tel: +32 9 264 34 46, fax: +32 9 264 35 93 WWW: http://photonics.intec.UGent.be email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
