I think you are right. Even for your own deck, if go out for a 2 months vacations when you come back, the ratings will be messed up, but it will adjust over time.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 12:10 PM, notstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, I have to admit, I may be a little bit overly concerned with > this kind of questions. On the other hand I think it may be an > intersting statistics/probability-related question in its own right, > but maybe it is just trivial, so please stop me if you think that > you've heard this one before. > > I am just wondering what happens when, from a specific point in time, > you learn a deck that's completely messed up in terms of card ratings > with respect to the "real" familiarity you have with individual cards > (be it because you took it from somebody else and didn't reset the > learning data, be it that you didn't grade the cards properly or for > any other reason). My guess would be that, over time,it converges > asymptotically (although with some lag) to the state of a deck whose > cards have been rated properly, as you will rate those cards that are > initially shown too often as being too simple and vice versa for those > cards that are not presented often enough, so that the initial > difference to the "ideal" state will cancel out over time. > > What do you think? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
