Continuing...
I was thinking about the analysis of the mnemosyne-proj data, about
how conclusions about longer intervals are weakened by the probability
that a card's info is being seen outside the program, or even on other
cards. But the above, #1, involves the shortest intervals possible and
probably a very simple analysis.
If you could justify demotion rather than failure, it would help
preserve the vast body of labor invested in the mountain of cards. It
would prove that this aspect of the usual algorithm is *anti-
productively punitive*.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mnemosyne-proj-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
