Sorry if this is clogging up your mailing list with a non-Mnemosyne related conversation, but here's a quick example comparison of the old- and new- style python documentation:
http://python.org/doc/2.5/lib/module-re.html http://docs.python.org/library/re.html I'd just be curious what you and OldGrantonian thought. I can see how the new documentation perhaps can be considered more professional, but there's some kind of old-school goodness I like about the old documentation. But I can't tell if I'm just being nostalgic or not. -- Ben ----------------- Original message ----------------- From: Peter Bienstman <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:56:25 +0200 BTW, libmnemosyne 2.x has its own documentation, built with sphynx. Look into mnemosyne/libmnemosyne/docs/build/html. It's a combination of machine generated docs and my own docs. Cheers, Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
