i'd rather not do that, as that would result in too many configuration options. If you really need that kind of flexibility, there are always plugins.
Peter On Sunday 13 September 2009 02:17:39 pm Luhmann wrote: > Perhaps it would be more interesting different limits for each, rather than > one global limit. As one can handle a greater number of lvl 1 cards than > lvl 0. > > --- En date de : Sam, 12.9.09, Peter Bienstman <[email protected]> a > écrit : Therefore, for 2.x I'm considering to change this to 'number of > unmemorised cards to hold in your hand', i.e. both grade 0 and grade 1 > cards count towards that limit. > > > > Découvrez les photos les plus intéressantes du jour. > http://www.flickr.com/explore/interesting/7days/ > ------------------------------------------------ Peter Bienstman Ghent University, Dept. of Information Technology Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, B-9000 Gent, Belgium tel: +32 9 264 34 46, fax: +32 9 264 35 93 WWW: http://photonics.intec.UGent.be email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------------ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
