> I meant getting some cards that are known to be easy, that are > scheduled to be repeated a relatively long time in the future.
I'm afraid that would mess up the long term scheduling. Also, the idea of the algorithm is actually not to waste your time on things you already know. Failure during the initial learning procedure is something inherent, I'm afraid. > Just a small remark about color coding: for me, clarity will always > take precedende over looks. This is the kind of stuff if you ask it to 10 people, you get 11 different answers :-) This is why in 2.x everything is restructured so that all parts of the GUI can be customised by plugins if people so desire. > Hmm, I guess now we're finally getting to the heart of the problem: I > still have trouble really understanding buttons 1 and 2! A very big difference is that 1 is a failing grade and 2 is a passing grade (hence the line between them). So, cards you grade 2 you won't see again until several days in the future, whereas those with grade 1 are presented for relearning once you go through all your scheduled cards. 1 is like 0, but cards with grade 0 will be shown twice as often when memorising them. Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
