> On Sep 6 at 07:58 +0200, Peter Bienstman wrote: > > BTW, from your recent mails I assume there are no concrete plans to > > port this to Mnemosyne 2.0 and/or support openSM2sync? > > The short answer is, sadly, that I currently have no concrete plans. > For a longer answer...
Thanks for taking the time for this update! > For Mnemosyne 2.x and Mnemojojo, the best course of action may simply > be to port the Mnemogogo plugin and leave Mnemojojo unchanged. OK. Anyhow, better to have a 2.x client without openSM2sync then no client at all :-) > Mnemododo, however, should support openSM2sync: Apart from porting Mnemododo to Mnemosyne 2.0, there is actually another route. Just run the Python libmnemosyne 2.0 codebase on Android, together with the webserver for reviews over http (did I mention already that I'm working on this, and that this is almost finished?). Point the Android browser to the correct local port, and you're good to go. Syncing can initially happen by running a separate Python script. This has the huge advantage that all the existing 2.0 code can be reused. For a future, more streamlined user experience, there could be a very simple app (either in Java or Python) which combines these elements, adds a fancier css specifically tailored for Android, etc.. Also here, anyone who's willing to help with this, would be more than welcome! Cheers, Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
