I'm wondering whether the same algorithm would be appropriate for procedural memory. I'm not intimately acquainted with Ebbinghaus' work, but I think it was based on declarative memory. These types of memory are executed by different parts of the brain (declarative in hippocampus, procedural is less understood), so there may indeed be differences. Any thoughts? Research?
I play piano, and if I don't practice a song from time to time, I forget how to play it completely. It's not that I can't remember the names of the chords, but my hands just don't know where to go. A mnemosyne card that reminds me to play a given song would be great, but I'm not sure that the algorithm would be appropriate for that sort of memory. On Jan 6, 3:26 pm, Gwern Branwen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Oisín <[email protected]> wrote: > > Very nice article. What do you mean by a system-wide executable here, > > though? Could we just check for an attribute "lang" or something, and take > > that to be the interpreter that will execute the (escaped) code in the src > > parameter? > > e.g. > > <eval src="a = rand(99)+1; b = rand(99)+1; puts \"#{a} * #{b} = #{a*b}\"" > > lang="ruby"/> > > Mnemosyne could just dump the src value to a temporary file and call the > > specified interpreter (in this case "ruby tmp"), capturing the standard as > > the result of the <eval>? > > Well, you could do this. For *some* languages. For some uses. And it > would quickly fall apart when one goes beyond a toy math example - how > does one link in all the libraries one might want to employ or specify > versions? This approach is not too terrible for one language used in > stereotypical ways, like the current Latex functionality. Whereas if > you simply shelled out to a specified executable, the executable could > be a script for whatever language or a compiled binary or whatever. > It's more flexible. > > > While I love the idea, I'm finding it hard to come up with simple-to-write > > dynamic cards that would really be useful, outside of perhaps some > > mathematical things like this or long division. > > Nobody has thought much about this sort of thing in an SRS context > before. Basically, one can take any computer-graded set of questions - > increasingly common in education - and turn it into SRS flashcards. > Programming exercises fromhttp://turingscraft.com/? English vocab > from AWAD or Wiktionary? Sure. I gave some examples like Go problems, > but maybe those aren't convincing to non-Go players; dynamic cards may > be like Blub* - you have a hard time understanding their value until > you develop them on their own or use them for a problem. > > * seehttp://www.paulgraham.com/avg.html&http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?BlubParadox > > -- > gwernhttp://www.gwern.net -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
