> I'd suggest maybe adding a text to the message box warning not to
> delete unused media files before going through the tagged missing > cards. Yes, I'll do that. > Hm. So retention rate is obviously no good, I simply don't use it and > it completely ignores large swathes of reviews. Not sure it ignores reviews, it's just not a relevant metric if you never fail a card. (which, might I add, is pretty exceptional I would think) > What metric would you > suggest? I was thinking 'average grade per day' might work, but seems > to me that this could be confounded - what if a bunch of cards with > low easiness are grouped onto one day? I'm afraid every metric you come up with will have that problem to some extent... > The question is whether my grade-performance is lower than one would > expect; does the algorithm have an 'expected' grade for each card? Yes, it's grade 4: 'correct recall with quite the right amount of effort, the scheduled interval felt just right'. Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mnemosyne-proj-users/-/gwOgwMzFEMAJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
