On 08/31/2012 03:36 PM, Betsemes wrote:
The only workaround I have thought of and the one I have been using is intentionally rating the related card either "0" or "1" when it shows up too early after to force it to be delayed and be repeated within the same session. This messes up the statistics, so if we don't care much for statistics as myself, this is an okay solution, but unaceptable for your memory research project, I think; if you want accurate and reliable data, of course. So as I see this problem, it affects mostly your data reliability and it would lead your research to be questionable.
The submitted science data is about millions and millions of cards, so the effects we are talking about are really in the noise :-)
Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
